Gov. Palin's Staff Now Refusing to Talk to Investigation into "Troopergate"

Gov. Sarah Palin had recently promised to co-operate fully with the investigation into her alleged abuse of power.  The memo must not have reached her staff, her executive powers must not be all that effective, or, more likely, the McCain campaign legal team trying to quash the investigation must be in control now.

This piece hit Alaskan news just prior to Gov. Palin being announced as the GOP VP nominee, after a recorded phone call showing her staff using the Governor's office for Palin's personal purposes was released to the public.  KTVA reports that Gov. Palin reversed course this day on her original denial of any type of abuse of power:

For those not familiar with the investigation, Gov. Palin had initially denied allegations that she, her husband and her staff had attempted to pressure then Public Safety Commisioner Walt Monegan into firing her sister's ex-husband due to a family vendetta after her sister's divorce.  When Monegan refused to take up the Palin family's personal matter, he was "offered the opportunity" to be reassigned to a lesser role and instead chose to quit.

Well, now seven of her staff including Frank Bailey - now on paid leave - who was taped on the telephone trying to get Trooper Wooten fired, have reneged on their promise to speak to the investigation.  Bailey was the first to refuse to testify on Friday, followed several hours later by the other six.

The investigation of Governor Sarah Palin for her potential abuse of powers has caused some within her administration to remain silent, as there are more members of the Palin administration who have joined Frank Bailey in not testifying. As the result of seven witnesses canceling their scheduled depositions with special investigator Steve Branchflower over the investigation of Governor Palin, the Legislature is taking action.

"There has been a recent series of cancellations and interviews that Mr. Branchflower had worked hard to set up. And because of those cancellations, we have now scheduled a hearing, joint House and Senate Judiciary Committee hearing for next Friday in order to consider the issue of whether subpoenas should be put out," said Senator Hollis French, a Democrat from Anchorage who was appointed the project director by the Legislative council for the investigation.

The seven names, including Frank Bailey, are Diane Kiesel, Nicki Neal, Brad Thompson and Annette Kreitzer--who all work for the Department of Administration--and Kris Perry and Karen Rehfeld who work for the office of the governor.

On Friday KTVA Alaska had an article on the reversal by Gov. Palin, her administration and her husband's denial of this pressure, including the taped phonecall from Frank Bailey to Monegan.

The KTVA coverage discusses this 2:35 into this video.

At 4:40 into the video, coverage continues of an ethics complaint filed by the union representing Trooper Wooten (PSEA/  AFSCME Local 803).  The union filed the complaint alleging that Gov. Palin and her staff have improperly used confidential information from Trooper Wooten's confidential files.

KTVA also did a review of Gov. Palin's speech at the RNC, Plain Speech - Fact or Fiction?, noting flaws with all of her major comments, which will be the subject of a future diary unless someone beats me to it.

-chris



Display:


Tips for the cure (2.00 / 3)

Gov' Palin's inability to speak is infecting the entire Alaskan state government.  Someone send the cure...


Motley Moose: Progress Through Politics
by chrisblask on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 12:43:04 AM EST

Re: Tips for the cure (none / 0)

Draft Laura Roslyn as President fer fracks sake, and send mooseburger mom home to play house.


I might be crazy... but are you seeing what I'm seeing?
by mydailydrunk on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 02:44:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

This is what happens when Rove... (2.00 / 4)

...takes over your communications team.

Same m.o. as what's happened inside the Beltway for the past eight years. Same disregard for the law as Bush and Cheney.

This move by Palin was definitely anticipated.


by bobswern on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 12:48:15 AM EST

"Change You Can't Detect" (2.00 / 3)

It's like looking at one of those "can you find the difference?" pictures...


Motley Moose: Progress Through Politics
by chrisblask on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 12:53:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This is what happens when Rove... (none / 0)

but do you see an ad about this from Obama? No. Are we using this to question her credibility? No. We are reacting, being defensive and cagey. This has 2004 written all over it.


by tarheel74 on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 12:59:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I haven't been watching TV, (2.00 / 2)

but I think it is premature to panic.  The Obama campaign are not stupid folks, let's see what they do with it.  In the meantime, we do what we can do.

This year doesn't look at all like 2004 in many many ways.  

-chris


Motley Moose: Progress Through Politics
by chrisblask on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 01:03:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I haven't been watching TV, (none / 0)

let me count the similarities:
2008 negative ads going unanswered (forcefully), in 2004 we had swiftboating which went unanswered

2008 whisper campaign about Obama's patriotism, 2004 about Kerry.

2008 GOP getting a giant bounce by energizing the conservative base on culture war, 2004 same

2008 GOP says election not about issues but character, 2004 we got a new term 'flip-flopper'

2008 Steve Schmidt running McCain campaign, 2004 same

2008 Democratic VP not attacking enough, 2004 John Edwards

We have only couple of things in our favor, ground game and a large number of new Democrats. However there are a few caveats, a big chunk of the new democrats in some states were Republicans who turned out to vote against Clinton and one also has to be aware of demoralization in the democratic base if this trend carries on too long.


by tarheel74 on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 01:16:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

And the differences: (2.00 / 2)

o  enormous enthusiasm by many for our candidate, unlike 2004

o  The incumbent president was not nearly as unpopular then as now.

o  The incumbent president was running for re-election, typically a big plus particularly in time of war. (the "switch horses" mentality)

o  The economy was not in the shitter in 04

o  The US was not as universally reviled worldwide.

o  The US currency was not decimated.

And from all we can tell, the big chunk of Republican anti-voters were Operation Chaos folks voting against Obama.  The republicans (or "former republicans") I meet are voting at the very least against George Bush III but most are enthusiastically pro-Obama.

I'm not saying the Obama campaign is necessarily without flaw, just that panic a/ never helps and b/ is at best assuming that we/you know something that the campaign doesn't.

This is not 2004.  We may win, we may lose, but it is a much much different time.

-best

-chris


Motley Moose: Progress Through Politics
by chrisblask on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 01:32:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Chris.. (2.00 / 1)

Thank you for pointing out what should be obvious.


by Dumbo on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 03:26:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I haven't been watching TV, (none / 0)

I think the Republicans who turned out to vote against Clinton might still be on board, at least some of them.  The operation chaos voters are the ones I'm worried about.


by Jordache on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 04:23:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

anti-voters voting against clinton (none / 0)

haven't been discussed much, so to be fair I suppose some may actually exist.  But as the GOP primay ended and they were freed up from voting for their own party, the Common Wisdom at the time was to follow the lead of talk radio and vote against Obama.  During TX/OH they were calling into the talk radio shows non-stop to brag about that vote, and they weren't bragging about out voting for Obama.

I think 95%+ of Republican Obama voters are like this lady:

and will stay on board.

-chris


Motley Moose: Progress Through Politics
by chrisblask on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 10:03:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Oh no... (2.00 / 1)

Tarheel, I'm all with you when it comes to going negative, but this is not the kind of thing that requires a negative ad.  Let the media soften up the front lines on this one, first.  Surrogates should bring it up in on-air appearances.  Do things in the proper order.


by Dumbo on Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 03:25:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.